|
31.
|
Statements: Some uniforms are covers.
All covers are papers. All papers are bags.
Conclusions:
I.
All
covers are bags.
II.
Some
bags are covers, papers and uniforms.
III.
Some
uniforms are not papers.
|
|
A.
|
Only I follows
|
|
B.
|
Only I and II follow
|
|
C.
|
Only III follows
|
|
D.
|
All I, II and III
follow
|
|
E.
|
None of these
|
|
Answer: Option B
Explanation:
Some uniforms are covers. All covers are papers.
Since one premise is particular, the
conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. So, it
follows that 'Some uniforms are papers'. All covers are papers. All papers are
bags.
Since both the premises are universal and
affirmative, the conclusion must be universal affirmative (A-type) and should
not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'All covers are bags'. Thus, I
follows. The converse of this conclusion i.e. 'Some bags are covers' also
holds.
Some uniforms are covers. All covers are
bags.
Since one premise is particular, the
conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. So, it
follows that 'Some uniforms are bags', The converse of this conclusion i.e.
'Some bags are uniforms' also holds.
Further, the converse of the third premise
i.e. 'Some bags are papers' holds.
Now, II is the cumulative result of the
conclusions 'Some bags are covers', 'Some bags are papers' and 'Some bags are
uniforms'. Thus, II follows.