|
16.
|
Statement: Should the consumption of
aerated drinks be banned in India?
Arguments:
I.
Yes.
This is the only way to reduce the risk of exposing people to some diseases.
II.
No.
Each individual should have right to choose what he wants.
III.
No.
There is no confirmed evidence that such products have adverse effects on
human body.
IV.
Yes.
It is banned in many other countries also.
|
|
A.
|
Only I is strong
|
|
B.
|
Only I and II are
strong
|
|
C.
|
Only III is strong
|
|
D.
|
Only I and IV are
strong
|
|
E.
|
All are strong
|
|
Answer: Option C
Explanation:
The use of 'only' in I makes it invalid.
Also, it is the duty of the government to save its citizens from intake of any
harmful products, even if they like them. So, II does not hold strong. Besides,
a product must not be banned unless its harmful effects have been proved. So,
III holds strong. Lastly, we cannot blindly follow the decisions taken by other
countries. So, IV also does not hold.
