|
37.
|
Statement: Should we scrap the
'Public Distribution System' in India?
Arguments:
I.
Yes,
Protectionism is over, everyone must get the bread on his/her own.
II.
Yes.
The poor do not get any benefit because of corruption.
|
|
A.
|
Only argument I is strong
|
|
B.
|
Only argument II is
strong
|
|
C.
|
Either I or II is
strong
|
|
D.
|
Neither I nor II is
strong
|
|
E.
|
Both I and II are
strong
|
|
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
The Public Distribution System is indeed
necessary to provide basic amenities to the economically backward sections of
population. So, argument I is vague. Also, if the Objectives of a system are
not fulfilled because of corruption, then getting rid of the system is no
solution. Instead, efforts should be made to end corruption and extend its
benefits to the people for whom it is meant. So, argument II also does not
hold,
