|
4.
|
Statement: Should all the youngsters
below 21 years of age be disallowed from going to a beer bar?
Arguments:
I.
No.
It is not correct to prevent matured youngsters above 18 years of age who can
vote, from having fun.
II.
Yes.
The entry fee to such pubs should also be hiked.
III.
No.
There is no such curb in western countries.
IV.
Yes.
This will help in preventing youngsters from getting into bad company and
imbibing bad habits.
|
|
A.
|
Only I is strong
|
|
B.
|
Only I and III are
strong
|
|
C.
|
Only III and IV are
strong
|
|
D.
|
Only I and IV are
strong
|
|
E.
|
None is strong
|
|
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
Clearly, our Constitution considers
youngsters above 18 years of age, mature enough to exercise their decisive
power in Government by voting. This implies that such individuals can also
judge what is good or bad for them. Thus, argument I holds strong. However, at
such places, youngsters may be lead astray by certain indecent guys and swayed
from the right path into bad indulgences. So, IV also holds strong. Hiking the
entry fees is no way to disallow them, and also the idea of imitating the
western countries holds no relevance. So, neither II nor III holds strong.
