|
58.
|
Statement: Should there be
concentration of foreign investment in only few states?
Arguments:
I.
No.
It is against the policy of overall development of the country.
II.
Yes.
A large number of states lack infrastructure to attract foreign investment.
|
|
A.
|
Only argument I is
strong
|
|
B.
|
Only argument II is
strong
|
|
C.
|
Either I or II is
strong
|
|
D.
|
Neither I nor II is
strong
|
|
E.
|
Both I and II are
strong
|
|
Answer: Option A
Explanation:
An equitable distribution of foreign
investment is a must for uniform development all over the country. So, argument
I holds. Also, no backward state ought to be neglected, rather such states
should be prepared and shaped up to attract. Foreign investment as well. So, II
does not hold.
