|
33.
|
Statements: All snakes are trees.
Some trees are roads. All roads are mountains.
Conclusions:
I.
Some
mountains are snakes.
II.
Some
roads are snakes.
III.
Some
mountains are trees.
|
|
A.
|
Only I follows
|
|
B.
|
Only II follows
|
|
C.
|
Only III follows
|
|
D.
|
Both I and II follow
|
|
E.
|
None follows
|
|
Answer: Option C
Explanation:
All snakes are trees. Some trees are roads.
Since the middle term is not distributed even
once in the premises, so no definite conclusion follows.
Some trees are roads. All roads are
mountains.
Since one premise is particular, the
conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. So, it
follows that 'Some trees are mountains'. III is the converse of this conclusion
and so it holds.
All snakes are trees. Some trees are
mountains.
Since the middle term is not distributed even
once in the premises, so no definite conclusion follows.