|
34.
|
Statements: All benches are desks.
Some desks are roads. All roads are pillars.
Conclusions:
I.
Some
pillars are benches.
II.
Some
pillars are desks.
III.
Some
roads are benches.
IV.
No
pillar is bench.
|
|
A.
|
None follows
|
|
B.
|
Only either I or IV, and
III follow
|
|
C.
|
Only either I or IV
follows
|
|
D.
|
Only either I or IV,
and II follow
|
|
E.
|
All follow
|
|
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
All benches are desks. Some desks are roads.
Since the middle term 'desks' is not
distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows.
Some desks are roads. All roads are pillars.
Since one premise is particular, the
conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. So, it
follows that 'Some desks are pillars'. II is the converse of this conclusion
and so it holds.
All benches are desks. Some desks are
pillars.
Since the middle term 'desks' is not
distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows. However,
I and IV involve the extreme terms and form a complementary pair. So, either I
or IV follows.